21
tapanmast Vora
·2009-03-16 22:14:17
oh this is priyam special, he dus the addtn of grafs real well
62
Lokesh Verma
·2009-03-16 22:16:54
amit please dont use any graph drawers
62
Lokesh Verma
·2009-03-16 22:17:49
The purposer of the graphs is not to see the beauty involved but to be able to analyse it yourself and learn
62
Lokesh Verma
·2009-03-16 22:18:45
No issues dude :)
I hope you get why i am trying to say this :)
62
Lokesh Verma
·2009-03-16 22:23:51
manipal.. whiy is there this kink at pi/4?
11
Mani Pal Singh
·2009-03-16 22:26:48
@nishant sir
DUE TO POOR DRAWING [3][2]
SIR I DIDNT MEANT A KINK THERE
106
Asish Mahapatra
·2009-03-16 22:26:49
for xε (0,π/2] .. the graph will be same shape as tanx ... but at x = 0, y=1...
106
Asish Mahapatra
·2009-03-16 22:28:12
for x ε [π/2, π) .. the graph will be that of tanx except that at x=π , y = -1 and the slope of the graph at x=π is zero.
11
Mani Pal Singh
·2009-03-16 22:30:50
@ ashish sorry to disagree u [2]
u should check double derivative....................[1]
106
Asish Mahapatra
·2009-03-16 22:33:51
in first quad. my analysis is correct..
1
palani ...............
·2009-03-17 01:03:13
graph in(-∩/2,∩/2)

graph is becoming a typical one in(∩/2,3∩/2)
will solve &post quickly