21
Swaraj Dalmia
·2012-02-05 06:37:12
Taking n2011+ r ≈ n2011
Ans=1.
262
Aditya Bhutra
·2012-02-06 02:00:33
g(n) = \lim_{n\rightarrow \propto }\sum{} \frac{1}{\sqrt[2011]{n^{2011}+n}}
h(n) = \lim_{n\rightarrow \propto }\sum{} \frac{1}{\sqrt[2011]{n^{2011}+0}}
f(n) = \lim_{n\rightarrow \propto }\sum{} \frac{1}{\sqrt[2011]{n^{2011}+r}}
now
g(n)\leq f(n)\leq h(n)
it can easily be found the g(n)=h(n)=1
hence by sandwich theorem, f(n)=1
1
johncenaiit
·2012-02-06 04:11:08
how g(n)=h(n)=1?
i got it as 0...by dividing numerator and denominator by n...
pls help....
262
Aditya Bhutra
·2012-02-06 04:51:59
g(n) = \lim_{n\rightarrow \propto }\sum{} \frac{1}{\sqrt[2011]{n^{2011}+n}}
g(n) = \lim_{n\rightarrow \propto }\ \frac{n}{\sqrt[2011]{n^{2011}+n}}
dividing numerator and denominator by n ,
g(n) = \lim_{n\rightarrow \propto }\ \frac{1}{\sqrt[2011]{1+n^{-2011}}} =1
h(n) =1 in a similar way
1
johncenaiit
·2012-02-06 05:21:00
still confused....:(
how does the numerator in your second step become n??
262
Aditya Bhutra
·2012-02-06 11:01:56
since it is a summation of n like terms. (note the summation sign)
1
johncenaiit
·2012-02-06 20:51:20
ok ...i got that step.....
but what if i do the same thing directly in the question????
every term becomes zero
262
Aditya Bhutra
·2012-02-06 22:47:15
all the terms are infinitely small , but they are added infinitely many times to give a significant result.