Another Inequality

Prove that for any " x , y > 0 " ,

x x + y y ≥ x y + y x

9 Answers

21
Shubhodip ·

Consider f(x,y) = xx+ yy- xy-yx

f(x,y) = f(y,x) , the function is symmetric

Let us fix some 'y'(y>0) and consider p(x) = xx+ yy- xy-yx

for x>0 , it's easy to conclude using elementary calculus that p(x)≥0

p takes it minimum value i.e. zero at x = 'y'

similar argument holds for g(y) = xx+ yy- xy-yx

we have proved f(x,y) ≥0 with equality iff x=y

1
gordo ·

same as
xx-yx≥xy-yy

im done if i can prove that for all a>b and p>q,
ap-bp>aq-bq

1
Ricky ·

Could you please show how you got " p ( x ) ≥ 0 " , Shubhodip ? Otherwise , it's alrighty :) .

@Gordo , exactly what I wanted . Could you please complete the solution ?

341
Hari Shankar ·

@gordo: you may hit rough weather when 0<a,b<1

21
Shubhodip ·

lol sir i m unable to prove that p(x)≥0

but i m sure p(x)≥0 is it wrong?

341
Hari Shankar ·

that would be the problem statement itself :D. you wouldnt need that f is symmetric in x,y

341
Hari Shankar ·

that would be the problem statement itself :D. you wouldnt need that f is symmetric in x,y

21
Shubhodip ·

no i hav fixed 'y'

i want to use calculus to prove that p(x)≥0

and p(x) takes minima at x = y

262
Aditya Bhutra ·

this is much simpler...

WAM >= WGM

xx + yy /2 >= √(xx .yy)

xy + yx >= √(xy. yx)

now,
(x.x + y.y) /2 >= (x+y)√(xx.yy)

(x.y +y.x )/2 >= √(xy.yx)

now we know, (x-y)2 >=0
or x2 +y2 >= 2xy

comparing with previous results we directly have the inequality

Your Answer

Close [X]