ring

27 Answers

1
Philip Calvert ·

well i still don't see how the answer is what it is
can u explain or maybe abhishek could explain

33
Abhishek Priyam ·

[3]

1
Philip Calvert ·

[1][3][4]

¬¬¬¬ I think abhi's are difft from mine
▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐ ▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐▐
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬☺☺☺☺☻☻☻☻♥♥♥♥♥♣♣♣♣♣◙◙◙◙◙

11
Anirudh Narayanan ·

How did u guys get the designs? [7]

33
Abhishek Priyam ·

[1]

1
Philip Calvert ·

╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤

yes abhi i got it u are rite

╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤╤

33
Abhishek Priyam ·

charges unlike means...[7]

if its non conducting charge distribution can be anything...

11
Anirudh Narayanan ·

Just like a dipole [4]

It is not necessary that the charge distribution is uniform. U can also have two discrete charge placed on diametrically opposite points [1]

1
Philip Calvert ·

╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬

hmmm... it never occurred to me that charges can be unlike also
....
ok

╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬╬

11
Subash ·

thanks abhiiiiiiiii [1]

33
Abhishek Priyam ·

▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄

i think its about what i said earlier it depends on distribution of charge...

it depends on λ as a function of θ... there can be such a function that enables this... that function jsut not striking right now...

but clearly signs can be thought of ..

_____________________
wait...
it can be q=-q0 for θ=900 and q=+q0 for θ=2700 and for rest θ q=0.. this can have field in direction 1
similarly for situation 2...

▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄

11
Subash ·

ani it was actually part of a matrix match question

@philip i cant explain cos i dunno thats why i asked this

11
Anirudh Narayanan ·

Philip, we can arrange charges so that the field at a point points in a direction we want it to [4]

11
Anirudh Narayanan ·

Ans can be: in any direction and not only 1, 2, 3 and 4 [4]

We are given these 4 options bcos only 4 options are allowed in an MCQ [4]

11
Subash ·

considering the circle as a charged ring the direction of the net electric field direction can be????

11
Subash ·

its not mentioned whether its conducting or not just that it is "charged" is given

11
Subash ·

guyz this is not a sitter i thought like that too

answer was 1,2,3,4

1
rahul wadhwani ·

ya component is possible whole vector along 1/2 is impossible at any cost

1
Philip Calvert ·

that is what i think i meant so the answer can never be 1 or 2

13
Двҥїяuρ now in medical c ·

a component along 1 or 2

1
rahul wadhwani ·

it is impossible to have 1/2 but we can get near 1/2 means some inclined small angle is there

1
Philip Calvert ·

abhi can you give a case when the direction of electric field is 1 or 2

even in the case of non uniform distribution of charge

i asked bcoz i could not see one

13
Двҥїяuρ now in medical c ·

Take it uniformly charged then 3 or 4

1
rahul wadhwani ·

tats also right but if u take uniform then .....but in this we have to preassumed, as all option r related to uniform distrbution i think subash has forgotten to write "conducting"

33
Abhishek Priyam ·

▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄

depends on ring is uniformly charged or not..

▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄

1
rahul wadhwani ·

ans. is 3 & 4 both possible for pt. with suitable signs but if u placed large(size) then this may differ from 3&4 but surely neither 1&2

1
chakde ·

THIS ONE'S A SITTER.........

ANS 3....

Your Answer

Close [X]