Nice one from ISI 2009

Let Xn be the n-th non square positive integer. Thus X1=2 , X2=3 , X3=5 , X4=6 , etc. For a positive number x, denote integer closest to it by <x> , if x = m + 0.5 where m is an integer then define <x> by m , for example <1.2>=1 , <2.8>=3 , <3.5>=3. then show that
Xn = n + <√n>

I'm 10^10 % sure that prophet sir and Nishant sir will have a million times better solution than mine :)

5 Answers

21
Shubhodip ·

Suppose P is any non square number

Its easy to see that X(p - [√p]) = P

All integers can be expressed as (p - [√p])

Let (p - [√p]) = n

so Xn = n + [√p] = n + <n>

As [√p] = <√ (p - [√p]) > hence proved

Proof of the property
[√p] = <√ (p - [√p]) >

As P is a non square number N2<P<(P+1)2

so [√p] = N

we have to prove <√ (p - [√p]) > = N

P can be written as N2 + K where 1≤K≤2N

so we have to prove <√(N2 + K - N)> = N

This is true because for N+1≤K≤2N we have N<√(N2 + K - N)<N + 0.5

and for 1≤K≤N-1 we have N- 0.5 <√(N2 + K - N)<N

for K = N its verified that <√(N2 + K - N)> = N

So proved

341
Hari Shankar ·

Or maybe we will present it in a such a posh manner it will look better :D.

First lets convert the <> to something we are familiar with.

note that

<x> = \left[x+\frac{1}{2} \right]

So, we look at the sequence

a_n = n +\left[\sqrt n+\frac{1}{2} \right]

Now let n=m^2+k; 0 \le k \le 2m

Its easy to prove that

m^2<m^2+m < \left(m+\frac{1}{2}\right)^2<m^2+m+1<(m+1)^2

That means

\left[\sqrt {m^2+k} + \frac{1}{2} \right] = m ; 0 \le k \le m^2+m

and

\left[\sqrt {m^2+k} + \frac{1}{2} \right] = m+1 ; m^2+m+1 \le k \le 2m

With this we easily see that the numbers

(m^2-m+1,m^2-m,..., m^2,...,m^2+m)

get mapped to

((m-1)^2+1,(m-1)^2+2,....,m^2+2m)-\left{m^2 \right}

Thus every natural number is obtained and the squares are missed

341
Hari Shankar ·

sorry, we seem to have started posting together

21
Shubhodip ·

EDIT : As P is a non square number N2 <P < (N+1)2

instead of N2 <P < (P+1)2

<x> = [x + 0.5]

this was great ..

1
fibonacci ·

nice solution shubhodip and as alwayss prophet sir. my solution is also similar, posting it below.

also pls post the time it took you to think of the solution . 2hrs<me<2.5hrs

Your Answer

Close [X]